<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yorkshire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foo.me.uk/yorkshire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foo.me.uk/yorkshire/</link>
	<description>software engineer attempts art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:20:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tancredi</title>
		<link>http://foo.me.uk/yorkshire/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Tancredi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foo.me.uk/?p=36#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I like the last two pictures! How did you manage to squeeze the depth of field down so far? When I try to take similar pictures I can never seem to reduce it far enough, even though I set the lens to f2.8...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the last two pictures! How did you manage to squeeze the depth of field down so far? When I try to take similar pictures I can never seem to reduce it far enough, even though I set the lens to f2.8&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

